[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > On Jun 19, Robert Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Email can also be "non-realtime" in the case of those that still use the >> old clunky, but still effective, UUCP method of mail delivery (I use this >> method on my dialup-based BBS that I still run).
> Indeed, I have been sending my mail with UUCP since more than 10 years > and I am not going to stop soon. That's fine. What people are asking for is best effort delivery, and eventual delivery of all valid messages. Your proposal (and your practice?) violate both of those. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
