Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Robert Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> >>>> Indeed, I have been sending my mail with UUCP since more than 10 years >>>> and I am not going to stop soon. >>> >>> That's fine. What people are asking for is best effort delivery, and >>> eventual delivery of all valid messages. Your proposal (and your >>> practice?) violate both of those. >> >> Clarify. >> >> As long as the email gets out via UUCP and comes in via UUCP without >> problems, I do not see HOW his practice and proposal violate "best >> effort delivery." Then again, it would seem that not everyone has the >> same definition of "best effort," now would they? > > Where I said "that's fine" I meant that his practice is fine, because > it's best effort (for that protocol).
To clarify, Marco's use of UUCP is fine; his blocking of valid email for illegitimate reasons is not. Especially since his reason is "you should pay so that I don't have to." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
