On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 10:48:38PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:48:54AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > It turned out that the central part of the existing infrastructure > > didn't scale up well enough to cope with the new architectures in sarge. > There are no new architectures in sarge. Oh, that's surprising. In any case, the problem with the new architectures would have been the increase in the number of buildds rather than the additional architectures per se - it's that which was the problem. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
