Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:48:54AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:34:21PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >>> But setting up autobuilders doesn't require a new infrastructure >>> (and shouldn't require more than half a year). >>> Wasn't the infrastructure a prerequisite for woody and is working? >> It turned out that the central part of the existing infrastructure >> didn't scale up well enough to cope with the new architectures in sarge. > There are no new architectures in sarge.
That's right, but the buildd network has to work for both oldstable and stable. potato + woody didn't need as many buildds as woody + sarge will need. Marc -- BOFH #221: The mainframe needs to rest. It's getting old, you know.
pgp1LSjXjahP0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
