Scripsit David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > That said, I'm a firm believer of the suggestion posed by Jesus > Climent[1], that we should have base set of software (where base is > probably a bit bigger than our current base) released for all > architectures that have a working installer, and then only have full > official releases for a limited set of architectures.
Such a base set of software would surely include a compiler toolchain, wouldn't it? If sounds plausible that the toolchain is the collection of software where architecture-specific bugs are _most_ likely to turn up, so would we actually have gained anything then? -- Henning Makholm "og de står om nissen Teddy Ring."
