Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > That said, I'm a firm believer of the suggestion posed by Jesus > > Climent[1], that we should have base set of software (where base is > > probably a bit bigger than our current base) released for all > > architectures that have a working installer, and then only have full > > official releases for a limited set of architectures. > > Such a base set of software would surely include a compiler toolchain, > wouldn't it? If sounds plausible that the toolchain is the collection > of software where architecture-specific bugs are _most_ likely to turn > up, so would we actually have gained anything then?
Toolchain bugs which affect the toolchain itself are usually quickly resolved, once a port is somewhat stable. If this isn't the case, then the port can't even stay in unstable for long. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
