Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:58:44 +0100, Andreas Barth > >>I was asked quite often via IRC what the reasonings for this kind of >>proposal were. I'll answer the reasons from the release point of view - but >>please remember that there are also ftp-masters/mirror concerns that the >>release team doesn't directly take care of, but which are of course still >>important. > > However, I currently do not expect ftpmaster to communicate with mere > mortals,
Anthony Towns was very active on the lists these days. The threads on -vote last week, IMO, were a nice example of non-communication - everybody talked, but Anthony did not understand our concerns, and we didn't understand him. But what he wrote on -devel about the Vancouver proposal was quite clear, and can be called communication. We are still lacking a rationale for the Vancouver proposal from the ftmasters, though. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
