Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (And please remember that even if the proposed policy would become > effective without any change, that doesn't necessarily mean the end to a > certain architecture,
Can you please elaborate on this? Many people have pointed out that having no testing, no stable release, and no security support would effectively mean the end of that architecture within Debian. Many people, some from the Vancouver team, have said that this is not the case; but all these statements involved some way of "it wasn't meant like that, it's not written clearly". Now you are saying that if the proposed policy would be implemented as the words stand, it would still not mean an end? Do you have new arguments for that, or is it just that you, too, think that the text does not express what you intended it to express? If the latter is true, pray rephrase the proposal, so that we know what we are talking about. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
