Goswin von Brederlow wrote: (and it really was him this time -- sorry about last time; hand-quoting is tricky stuff): >Is the pseudo source file enough for BSD or Artistic license?
It's enough for BSD. (Which doesn't actually require source.) >On the same subject but going in a totally different direction: > >As you say many blobs have been identified as code. Having pseudo >source files under a free license would give everyone the right to >disassemble the code. Reverese engeneering of the firmware would be >allowed. Allowing pseudo source might be benefitial because it alows >this. Yes. BSD-licensed BLOBs could be legally disassembled, decompiled, cleaned up, commented, improved, and the result could be Free.
