Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why should elf-aggregation always mean to be part of a derived code, and > fs-level aggregation mean that not? Even e.g. Linus writes that there > _are_ examples where elf-aggregation does not mean a derived work (well, > of course: the default assumptation is that it is derived, but it could > be proven otherwise).
Is Linus a lawyer or is his stance backed up by a court decision? Assuming the answer is no (which I believe it is), what does it matter what Linus thinks on the matter?
