Hi! On 2003-12-15 10:04 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > >From the view point of libc6 maintainer, it's no problem to merge /sys > mount for /etc/init.d/devpts.sh. The name of devpts.sh should be > renamed to something, though. And it can be also applied for /dev/shm > tmpfs.
That sounds reasonable. I just don't wanted it in devpts.sh. What about /etc/init.d/kernfs or mountkernfs? > One remaining concern is: is it ok to create /sys and /dev/shm > directory by glibc package? I don't have neither the authority nor the experience to decide this :-), but speaking as an user I would like that. Please just don't do it when it already exists AND there are files in it (or sth different than sysfs is mounted on it). Creating /dev/shm should be less problematic. Have a nice day! Martin -- Martin Pitt Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.piware.de http://www.debian.org
