also sprach Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.25.0044 +0200]: > I'm perfectly willing to bet that more of our users are interested > in a functional ipsec stack than are interested in the grsecurity > patch.
I am not opposing having a patch provide that stack. > >"it's a chunk of code that has almost nothing to do with the core > >kernel code" > > In that it can be inserted without modifying behaviour of things > that other parts of the kernel or userland depend upon. The IPsec part, yes. But a whole different IP stack will be used whenever. > I'm a Windows user when I'm paid to be, yes. I am sorry. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
pgpcesgCJ3DaA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
