On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 01:54:43PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 12:41:48PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 08:00:07PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Talk is cheap. If you can come up with a solution to the C++ problem that
> > > ignited this debate then i386 would be safe.
> >
> > Nobody has even explained WHY we have this issue. The summary posted on the
> > bug report just said that there is a problem with atomicity.h, not what the
> > problem is or why it exists.
>
> Where is automicity.h?
("atomicity.h")
You could use locate(1) ...
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
