On Monday 23 June 2003 19:41, John Goerzen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 08:00:07PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > > John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Talk is cheap. If you can come up with a solution to the C++ problem > > that ignited this debate then i386 would be safe. > > Nobody has even explained WHY we have this issue. The summary posted on > the bug report just said that there is a problem with atomicity.h, not what > the problem is or why it exists.
You can find the original description by Matthias Klose in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200304/msg01895.html In one thread following that message, see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200304/msg02163.html, it was concluded that a solution to the problem exists, but no one worked out the details or created a patch. Arnd <><
