On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 12:41:48PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 08:00:07PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > > John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Talk is cheap. If you can come up with a solution to the C++ problem that > > ignited this debate then i386 would be safe. > > Nobody has even explained WHY we have this issue. The summary posted on the > bug report just said that there is a problem with atomicity.h, not what the > problem is or why it exists.
Where is automicity.h?
