On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 09:05:50PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > I agree, the vast majority of our users can afford newer machines. So, I > think we should drop m68k, mips and other similar unfashionable old > archs, don't you think? The majority of our users will be happy... I'm not sure where the misconception of mips being an "old" arch comes from. Just look at the au1500 or the R1x000 CPUs. What are criteria for an architecture being "old" and "unfashionable"? Regards, -- Guido
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Nick Phillips
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Chris Cheney
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Russell Coker
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Grzegorz B. Prokopski
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Bart Trojanowski
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Nick Phillips
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Steve Langasek
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Anthony DeRobertis
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Andreas Metzler
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Gunnar Wolf
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Guido Guenther
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Martin Schulze
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Anthony DeRobertis
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ José Luis Tallón
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Jonathan Oxer
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Sven Luther
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Tollef Fog Heen
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Arnd Bergmann
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Andreas Metzler
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Nick Phillips
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++ Hamish Moffatt