On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 12:50:55AM +0000, Simon Huggins wrote: > > There are currently 11 orphaned xfce4-* packages in unstable, including > > three that have just been removed from testing due to RC bugs that went > > virtually unnoticed since the last upload in May. > > I know the -goodies packages are in bad shape. > > > Please take some time to help figure out what should be done with > > these packages -- cleaned up/adopted, or removed from the archive -- > > before ITPing more packages in the xfce4 namespace. > > Sure. I think for sarge they can be cleaned up/updated. I've just > finished a stretch getting the 22 packages for the main body of xfce4 > for 4.2.0 for experimental sorted this weekend so I'm a bit knackered > currently. > > To be honest I'd been expecting others to sort out the -plugins for > sarge given people had said they would.
Hi Simon,
Being the maintainer that parented the xfce4-goodies Debian packages I
feel somewhat responsible for the current state that they're in. I only
have so much time free to work on them since I switched over to working
with the Debian-GNOME team, but since a freeze is "coming soon (TM)", I
would be willing to help co-maintain them and get them back on the road
again.
Apart from time constraints, I've been reluctant to update xfce4-goodies
again since I don't have XFce 4.2 libraries to build against.
One thing that would get the ball moving again would be to check
everything into a svn.debian.org tree so that almost anyone can chip in
(just like in pkg-gnome).
Cheers,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau <http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~alau/>
Debian GNU/Linux Maintainer & UNSW Computing Students' Society President
-
"Nobody expects the Debian Inquisition!
Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency!"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
