* [ 19-01-05 - 15:57 ] Rudy Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El d?a 18/01/2005 a 12:53 Emanuele Rocca escribio ... > > > WNPP bugs for some of the -goodies need to be retitled from O: to ITP:. > > They wouldn't be ITA?
Indeed.
> > I found the time to check -battery-plugin and -clipman-plugin, and I
> > must admit that they're not in a good shape (ITP bugs not closed in the
> > changelog, bugs marked as fixed are actually still reproducible, lintian
> > is not happy)...
>
> I don't see any ITP bugs on those both.
s/ITP/ITA/
#245114 and #245115, against WNPP.
> > Why is the Debian Xfce Packages Alioth project dead? [0]
> > IMHO putting these packages under collaborative maintenance would be a
> > better idea.
>
> Yes, I agree on this. In fact I remember asking for some "review" from
> other Xfce maintainers before upload/ask for sponsorship.
Andrew Law kindly added us to the Alioth project, we can start working
there; I also asked him to create a public mailing list.
ciao,
ema
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
