On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 19:16, Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> wrote:
>
> [Changed bug number which is now more affected by my mail]
>
> Hi Sudip,
>
> Am Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 02:28:04PM +0000 schrieb Sudip Mukherjee:
> > cancelled now. sorry for the delay.  Was stuck in meetings in $dayjob.
>
> No problem at all.  I think you do not need to cancel if there is
> a newer package in unstable before the delayed is accepted.
>
> > > PS: @Sudip: I'm also working on v-sim.  Thanks a lot for your
> > >     patch but this package is using cdbs and I want to clean
> > >     this up.
> >
> > Do you want me to cancel or delay v-sim?
>
> I'm close to a way more polished version including your patch (thanks a
> lot for it again!)  I've switched to dh, fixed Homepage and watch file
> and upgraded to the latest upstream version.  Since I think I'm close to
> ready your NMU will be rejected - but feel free to cancel it if you
> think its more clean.  In any way your contribution is more than welcome
> even if both are canceled in these specific cases.
>
> > Maybe you can use it as an example in Bangkok. :)
>
> I have the feeling this could be a helpful hint but I admit I don't
> get it.

I was going to suggest to use this package as an example on the
workshop that you are planning to run after FOSSASIA ( On Sunday).
But since you have already done the polishing, so please ignore.


-- 
Regards
Sudip

Reply via email to