Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:52:26AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Hello Rob and Thomas, >> > >> > This bug is assigned to libglade9 which has been removed from >> > unstable. >> > >> > As a consequence, this bug should either be closed or reassigned. >> >> Bug 337346 (in your subject line) has nothing to do with glade, and is >> closed as of guile-1.6/1.6.7-2. >> >> Bug 337358 (to which you sent the email) doesn't mention libglade9 at >> all, and is not assigned to libglade9. > > Sorry, I meant libguile9
libguile9 has not actually been removed from unstable; see http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=libguile9. Perhaps the maintainer should file a request with the FTP masters to have it removed, at which point the bug will be automatically closed. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
