On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:25:06AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:52:26AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > Hello Rob and Thomas, > >> > > >> > This bug is assigned to libglade9 which has been removed from > >> > unstable. > >> > > >> > As a consequence, this bug should either be closed or reassigned. > >> > >> Bug 337346 (in your subject line) has nothing to do with glade, and is > >> closed as of guile-1.6/1.6.7-2. > >> > >> Bug 337358 (to which you sent the email) doesn't mention libglade9 at > >> all, and is not assigned to libglade9. > > > > Sorry, I meant libguile9 > > libguile9 has not actually been removed from unstable; see > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=libguile9.
The link you post only lists libguile9 in _stable_. Furthermore on merkel: % madison libguile9 libguile9 | 1:1.4-24 | oldstable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libguile9 | 1:1.4-26 | stable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc So it seems pretty clear libguile9 was removed. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
