On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:08:37AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > >> libguile9 has not actually been removed from unstable; see > >> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=libguile9. > > > > The link you post only lists libguile9 in _stable_. > > No, it doesn't. I can only wonder if you actually follewd it.
Actually I made a copy-paste error: I did lynx 'http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all+&exact=1&keywords=libguile9' so I did not get the html data you provide, sorry about that. > I see the following when I follow that link. What do you see? With your data I get Package libguile9 * oldstable (libs): libraries for Guile1.4 (guile, guilereadline, and qthreads). 1:1.4-24: alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc * stable (libs): libraries for Guile1.4 (guile, guilereadline, and qthreads) 1:1.4-26: alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc * unstable (libs): libraries for Guile1.4 (guile, guilereadline, and qthreads) 1:1.4-26: kfreebsd-i386 But kfreebsd-i386 does not count since it use an external archive and the ftp-masters cannot remove packages there, so as far as the official archive is concerned, libguile9 was removed from unstable. Now, that we are back on track, do you know whether this bug should be reassigned or closed ? Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
