Чт 23 апр 2020 @ 14:15 Jonas Smedegaard <jo...@jones.dk>: >> Ohhh, I see. Let me upload (source-only) 8.1.29 to unstable. Will be OK >> for you? > > If I understand the situation correctly, then this is a bug in how eye > is packaged: A prolog image is dumped during build and shipped as the > executable for eye. That image makes starting eye faster, but requires > same version of prolog. > > My current thinking is that no change is needed from prolog: Instead, > eye must be tightened to depend on same version of prolog as was used to > build the image (and then each new release of prolog needs a binNMU of > eye). > > Does that sound correct to you?
Looks like you're correct. Another thing that disturb me is that eye downloads test data from github repository while testing. So, change in tests upstream may break stuff in Debian even without any change in the Debian archive. But maybe I'm wrong about volatility of upstream test data. What do you think? Regards, Lev
