Control: reopen -1 Quoting Paul Gevers (2020-04-23 13:37:43) > On 23-04-2020 12:56, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Ohh, the test failure I reference was for _testing_ - I thought it > > was for _unstable_ and was puzzled why it also failed there. > > > > Yes, I agree that this looks like just an autopkgtest issue (but > > makes me wonder if eye should include Build-Using:). > > > > @Paul: Please let this through, despite autopkgsuite failing for > > testing. > > You mean, this is *only* an autopkgtest issue and does *not* point at > missing *versioned* dependencies? > > I.e. if *only* eye from unstable would migrate to testing, but *not* > swi-prolog, eye works correctly in testing? > > To be clear, I don't intent to "let this through". What I can do is > schedule the tests for both swi-prolog and eye with *both* packages > from unstable. I *assume* they would pass and that would unblock their > migration from autopkgtest point of view.
Thanks for being cautious. There _is_ a problem, it seems. Please ignore my previous request. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
