Your message dated Thu, 23 Apr 2020 12:56:23 +0200
with message-id <158763938357.706968.17592079271467320...@auryn.jones.dk>
and subject line Re: Bug#958419: fixed in eye 20.0411.2226~ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #958419,
regarding swi-prolog breaks eye autopkgtest: Failed 7/15 subtests
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
958419: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958419
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: swi-prolog, eye
Control: found -1 swi-prolog/8.1.28+dfsg-1
Control: found -1 eye/19.0928.2249~ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update

Dear maintainer(s),

With a recent upload of swi-prolog the autopkgtest of eye fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of
swi-prolog from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from
testing. In tabular form:

                       pass            fail
swi-prolog             from testing    8.1.28+dfsg-1
eye                    from testing    19.0928.2249~ds-1
all others             from testing    from testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration of swi-prolog to
testing [1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report
against both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and
reassign the bug to the right package?

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=swi-prolog

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/e/eye/5057663/log.gz

autopkgtest [05:57:12]: test command1: prove debian/tests/*.t
autopkgtest [05:57:12]: test command1: [-----------------------

#   Failed test 'Process terminated without a signal'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 9.
#          got: '6'
#     expected: '0'

#   Failed test 'bare command, stderr'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 11.
#                   '[FATAL ERROR: at Sun Apr 19 05:57:12 2020
#       /usr/bin/eye.pvm: incompatible version (file: 66, Prolog: 67)]
# '
#     doesn't match '(?^:Usage: eye.pvm)'

#   Failed test 'Process terminated without a signal'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 13.
#          got: '6'
#     expected: '0'

#   Failed test 'help, stderr'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 15.
#                   '[FATAL ERROR: at Sun Apr 19 05:57:12 2020
#       /usr/bin/eye.pvm: incompatible version (file: 66, Prolog: 67)]
# '
#     doesn't match '(?^:Usage: eye.pvm)'

#   Failed test 'Process terminated without a signal'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 17.
#          got: '6'
#     expected: '0'

#   Failed test 'help, stderr'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 18.
#                   ''
#     doesn't match '(?^:r:because)'

#   Failed test 'help, stderr'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 19.
#                   '[FATAL ERROR: at Sun Apr 19 05:57:12 2020
#       /usr/bin/eye.pvm: incompatible version (file: 66, Prolog: 67)]
# '
#     doesn't match '(?^s:starting .*\nGET .*\nnetworking .*\nreasoning)'
# Looks like you failed 7 tests of 15.
debian/tests/eye.pvm.t ..
Dubious, test returned 7 (wstat 1792, 0x700)
Failed 7/15 subtests

Test Summary Report
-------------------
debian/tests/eye.pvm.t (Wstat: 1792 Tests: 15 Failed: 7)
  Failed tests:  2, 5, 7, 10, 12, 14-15
  Non-zero exit status: 7
Files=1, Tests=15,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr  0.00 sys +  0.06 cusr
0.01 csys =  0.10 CPU)
Result: FAIL
autopkgtest [05:57:13]: test command1: -----------------------]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Quoting Lev Lamberov (2020-04-23 12:15:12)
> Чт 23 апр 2020 @ 11:58 Jonas Smedegaard <jo...@jones.dk>:
> 
> > Quoting Lev Lamberov (2020-04-23 11:38:36)
> 
> >> Чт 23 апр 2020 @ 10:59 Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org>:
> 
> >> > [Release team member hat on]
> >> >
> >> > On 21-04-2020 23:48, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> >> >>  eye (20.0411.2226~ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> >> >>  .
> >> >>    [ upstream ]
> >> >>    * new release(s)
> >> >>      + FIXED: process_create/3: stderr was sent to stdout.
> >> >>        closes: Bug#958419, thanks to Paul Gevers
> >> >
> >> > It seems that this fix works with swi-prolog in unstable, but not 
> >> > with swi-prolog in testing. Which means that you're missing a 
> >> > versioned (test) dependency somewhere. Now *both* packages are not 
> >> > migrating. If this is *only* an autopkgtest issue, I'm willing to 
> >> > trigger the combination manually, but I prefer you fix the (test) 
> >> > dependencies.
> >> 
> >> one of the reasons why swi-prolog does not migrate to testing is 
> >> binary upload, I will prepare source-only upload of the latest 
> >> upstream version in the next couple of days.
> >
> > That would be nice, but seems unrelated to the issue with eye.
> >
> > @Lev: Do you have an ida why eye fails like this:
> >
> >   incompatible VM-signature (file: 0xde23899e; Prolog: 0x10c53d6a)]
> >
> > See bottom of 
> > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/e/eye/5106659/log.gz
> 
> Hmmm... I'm not sure, but my guess is as follows. Since (1) parts of 
> tests are downloaded during testing, and (2) as I can see upstream 
> developers of eye recently changed tests to comply with swi-prolog 
> 8.1.28 (see, upstream commit 
> eb3f074a11c8be9d82950f7a98c5d1d12fcc0254), (3) testing currently 
> contains swi-prolog 8.0.3 and autopkgtests fail with it, and (4) eye 
> in unstable (with swi-prolog 8.1.28) passes autopkgtests, then I think 
> that to fix it we need newer swi-prolog in testing.

Ohh, the test failure I reference was for _testing_ - I thought it was 
for _unstable_ and was puzzled why it also failed there.

Yes, I agree that this looks like just an autopkgtest issue (but makes 
me wonder if eye should include Build-Using:).

@Paul: Please let this through, despite autopkgsuite failing for 
testing.

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to