On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:09:06PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > dpkg: error processing amavisd-new (--purge): > > subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 128
> Exit status 128 is an unusual return status. Moreover, debconf should never > return it. WTF? 129 would be killed by SIGHUP, but 128 has no definition. > If we cannot reproduce this, it will be quite hard to find out what is > happening :( I think the point is that you're not allowed to rely on non-essential packages being present in the postrm stage. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
