On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:09:06PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > dpkg: error processing amavisd-new (--purge):
> > > subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 128
>
> > Exit status 128 is an unusual return status. Moreover, debconf should never
> > return it. WTF? 129 would be killed by SIGHUP, but 128 has no definition.
>
> > If we cannot reproduce this, it will be quite hard to find out what is
> > happening :(
>
> I think the point is that you're not allowed to rely on non-essential
> packages being present in the postrm stage
We don't.
# Automatically added by dh_installdebconf
if [ "$1" = purge ] && [ -e /usr/share/debconf/confmodule ]; then
. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
db_purge
fi
# End automatically added section
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
