On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:49:59PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:09:06PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > dpkg: error processing amavisd-new (--purge): > > > subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 128 > > > Exit status 128 is an unusual return status. Moreover, debconf should never > > return it. WTF? 129 would be killed by SIGHUP, but 128 has no definition. > > > If we cannot reproduce this, it will be quite hard to find out what is > > happening :( > > I think the point is that you're not allowed to rely on non-essential > packages being present in the postrm stage. That isn't the problem here, since the command was just dpkg -P amavisd-new.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
