Kurt Roeckx: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:36:46PM +0000, Chris Knadle wrote: >> Kurt Roeckx: >>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:58:30PM +0000, Chris Knadle wrote: >>>> >>>> Everybody dealing with the mumble bug agrees that SSL should be initialized >>>> before making SSL calls -- the reason I opened #804487 is to try to figure >>>> out /what/ caused mumble_1.2.10-2+b1 to break, when mumble_1.2.10-2 works. >>>> And I just tested -- mumble_1.2.10-2 works with openssl_1.0.2d-3. >>>> snapshot.debian.org has the before-and-after binNMU here: >>> >>> I assume you mean 1.0.2d-1 there. The soname changed between -1 >>> and -3 you actually get a different binary package. >> >> Let me be more specific: mumble_1.2.10-2 that was built with >> openssl_1.0.2d-1 works fine with openssl 1.0.2d-3 installed -- yet >> mumble_1.2.10-2+b1 that was /built/ with openssl_1.0.2d-3 does not. > > Please note the "openssl" binary package version doesn't change > anything. You don't depend on it, you use the library. > > Mumble_1.2.10-2 uses the binary package "libssl1.0.0" (version > 1.0.2d-1) while mumble_1.2.10-2+b1 uses libssl1.0.2 (version > 1.0.2d-3).
Ah. Yes -- verified. I guess that leaves only the openssl regression testing. -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us
