Kurt Roeckx: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:58:30PM +0000, Chris Knadle wrote: >> >> Everybody dealing with the mumble bug agrees that SSL should be initialized >> before making SSL calls -- the reason I opened #804487 is to try to figure >> out /what/ caused mumble_1.2.10-2+b1 to break, when mumble_1.2.10-2 works. >> And I just tested -- mumble_1.2.10-2 works with openssl_1.0.2d-3. >> snapshot.debian.org has the before-and-after binNMU here: > > I assume you mean 1.0.2d-1 there. The soname changed between -1 > and -3 you actually get a different binary package.
Let me be more specific: mumble_1.2.10-2 that was built with openssl_1.0.2d-1 works fine with openssl 1.0.2d-3 installed -- yet mumble_1.2.10-2+b1 that was /built/ with openssl_1.0.2d-3 does not. >> http://snapshot.debian.org/package/mumble/1.2.10-2/ >> >> I'm looking at and comparing the build logs, and one of the things I see is >> that the build pulled in both libssl1.0.0 and libssl1.0.2, where the prior >> build only pulled in libssl1.0.0. ldd shows that only libssl1.0.2 is linked >> in the resulting 'mumble' binary. That doesn't sound right. > > It's one of your build dependencies that was probably still using > libssl1.0.0 and probably isn't anymore. That shouldn't case any > issue. Okay. -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us
