On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:58:30PM +0000, Chris Knadle wrote: > > Everybody dealing with the mumble bug agrees that SSL should be initialized > before making SSL calls -- the reason I opened #804487 is to try to figure > out /what/ caused mumble_1.2.10-2+b1 to break, when mumble_1.2.10-2 works. > And I just tested -- mumble_1.2.10-2 works with openssl_1.0.2d-3. > snapshot.debian.org has the before-and-after binNMU here:
I assume you mean 1.0.2d-1 there. The soname changed between -1 and -3 you actually get a different binary package. > http://snapshot.debian.org/package/mumble/1.2.10-2/ > > I'm looking at and comparing the build logs, and one of the things I see is > that the build pulled in both libssl1.0.0 and libssl1.0.2, where the prior > build only pulled in libssl1.0.0. ldd shows that only libssl1.0.2 is linked > in the resulting 'mumble' binary. That doesn't sound right. It's one of your build dependencies that was probably still using libssl1.0.0 and probably isn't anymore. That shouldn't case any issue. Kurt
