Hello Steve, On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:32:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:45:55PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Hello Steve, > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:07:32AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Does this bug actually apply to unstable or testing, where we do have both > > > gtk+ 2.6 and libglade 2.5? Is anything required here other than a rebuild > > > against current unstable? > > > (Sorry for the late reply, I was on vacation and just returned) > > > I definitly applies to stable and it probably applies to unstable as > > well. According to upstream[1], a rebuild (against current unstable) should > > be > > sufficient. If you want, I can check this in the next days. > > Yes, please check it and I can schedule binNMUs for the issue.
Ok, I just checked in a up-to-date sid changeroot and a simple rebuild
is sufficient to solve this issue[0].
On the other hand, the latest upstream version (0.9.93) builds fine as
well[1]. It most likly closes all goobox-bugs except #291567. Right now,
goobox has trouble accessing my CD-ROM from within my changeroot, so I
cannot fully test #319719. If you think it is worthwile, I can prepare
a QA-upload with the new upstream and orphaning goobox. Since the
po-file changed, I would request #314066 to be redone first[2], though.
Tell me if you think such a QA-Upload would be sensible[3].
Greetings
Helge
[0] Please do not close #319713 but retitle it and ask for tighter
(build-)dependencies (which would no longer be RC, of course).
[1] Well, the Debian-patch does not apply cleanly anymore (but this
concerns config.sub and config.guess only, where I simply to the
latest Debian ones), and I also removed the patches applied at
build time (which I think are not neccesary anymore). If I should
prepare a QA upload, I would of course double check if everything
is (still) ok or provide updated patches.
[2] Actually I would double-check the current one first myself and
would after review submit the final one upstream.
[3] If you prefer, I can also ask Martin Michlmayr who sponsors other
packages of mine if he thinks a QA upload should be prepared with
the new upstream version.
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg signed mail preferred
64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
pgpNt5dguMiNP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
