Hi, I don't see my previous mail in the sent folder and also forgot to cc the bugtracker, so here I go again:
> > A far fetched thought maybe, but me using mozilla.debian.net's > > experimental iceweasel (v5 as of yesterday in the evening, v4 before > > that) couldn't be related, could it? > I thought of that, too when I first ran into this. Luckily I don't > think they're related, since they use different copies of xulrunner. > Attempts along the lines of "uninstall iceweasel, experiment, install > iceweasel, experiment more" didn't get me anywhere. OK, just to be sure ;). > > I also have experimental's sources active but only cherry-pick some > > packages from it. As far as I know our dependency list should be quite > > the same apart from those two packages mentioned above as I see no > > other packages having alternatives. > > Ah, sorry to be dense. Here's a current list, for convenient > diff-ing. > [...] OK, when doing this: sebrem@neocortex:~$ diff sebrem jonathan 3c3 < libc6 2.13-1 --- > libc6 2.13-2 7,8c7,8 < libdrm2 2.4.24-2 < libegl1-mesa --- > libdrm2 2.4.25-1 > libegl1-mesa 7.10-4 14,15c14,15 < libgl1-mesa-glx 7.10.2-1 < libglib2.0-0 2.28.6-1 --- > libgl1-mesa-glx 7.10.2-2 > libglib2.0-0 2.28.6-2 40c40 < zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 --- > zlib1g 1:1.2.5.dfsg-1 I see we do have different versions of multiple packages although I do use an experimental source, too, especially our libc6 is different although there is no newer version available for me at the moment. Maybe the archive I use is syncing slower. deb http://debian.uni-duisburg-essen.de/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free deb-src http://debian.uni-duisburg-essen.de/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free But I think our libs are not comparable easily then. Kind regards Sebastian
jonathan
Description: Binary data
sebrem
Description: Binary data
