Jeff Licquia writes:
> I can confirm that the only binary htmldoc packages I have built (i386)
> were built on an unstable system updated that day.  The current version,
> 1.8.24-2, appears to be fine on all architectures besides arm and
> powerpc, which appear to be out of date.  The problems with arm seem to
> be caused by a lag in the C++ migration, and the powerpc problem seems
> to be in libpng instead of htmldoc.
> 
> Perhaps the autobuilders for those two architectures could be persuaded
> to try again, since they haven't tried in over a month.
> 
> In the meantime, given that htmldoc does build properly with any version
> of fltk 1.1 that is provided, perhaps you could explain what is wrong
> with the build dependency that is there.

The problem was seen with -1 (the binary depending on libstdc++6 and
libfltk1.1c102).  IMO it's still wrong to upload a package without
tightened version dependencies, before all depending C++ libraries are
in the archive for all architectures. If you want to do the upload,
without all architectures at the new fltk1.1 version, then you have to
tighten the build dependencies.

  Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to