On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 07:46 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > The problem was seen with -1 (the binary depending on libstdc++6 and > libfltk1.1c102). IMO it's still wrong to upload a package without > tightened version dependencies, before all depending C++ libraries are > in the archive for all architectures. If you want to do the upload, > without all architectures at the new fltk1.1 version, then you have to > tighten the build dependencies.
Yes, I recall the problem with -1. And I see your point. I prefer that the build deps not lie, so stable people can use the source package for as long as possible, but I should then wait for the library transition to complete for all architectures. I have a few other little things to clean up, so I will go ahead and do a -3, which should fix all the problems (possibly modulo the powerpc issue). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
