On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:54:30AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 07:46 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > The problem was seen with -1 (the binary depending on libstdc++6 and > > libfltk1.1c102). IMO it's still wrong to upload a package without > > tightened version dependencies, before all depending C++ libraries are > > in the archive for all architectures. If you want to do the upload, > > without all architectures at the new fltk1.1 version, then you have to > > tighten the build dependencies.
> Yes, I recall the problem with -1. And I see your point. I prefer that > the build deps not lie, so stable people can use the source package for > as long as possible, but I should then wait for the library transition > to complete for all architectures. > I have a few other little things to clean up, so I will go ahead and do > a -3, which should fix all the problems (possibly modulo the powerpc > issue). htmldoc has been built on the ppc autobuilder now, FWIW. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
