On 24/12/09 at 19:56 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 24/12/09 at 13:02 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> >> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >>> On 24/12/09 at 12:04 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> >>>>  I suggest there might be something wrong with the amd64 build box
> >>>> you're using as the buildd report [1] shows that 0.9.5.dfsg-5 was built
> >>>> successfully Dec 12th. I've also re-downloaded the 0.9.5.dfsg-5 version
> >>>> from the mirrors and rebuilt under a pbuilder chroot and it built
> >>>> successfully as well. The -4 version of the package had a problem in the
> >>>> debian/rules that caused this behavior but it was fixed in the -5 
> >>>> release.
> >>> Could you please diff your log with mine, to see if the problem was
> >>> possibly caused by different build-dep versions ?
> >>>
> >>    I'm building on i386 as my amd64 boxes are currently still offline
> >> along with my hppa and alpha machines. The official amd64 buildd I sent
> >> the URL that was available for the log. When looking through it I didn't
> >> see any failures. However that log format and your log format are
> >> completely different and do not lend themselves to diff comparison.
> > 
> > I'm talking about a build in an up-to-date sid chroot, not something
> > that happened 10 days ago.
> 
>       Here's the build for me... The source is from the mirror using dget and
> not from the git repo [1] that it was originally built and submitted to
> the mirror from. Prior to the build I did a 'pbuilder update' for
> DIST=sid to ensure it was current.

It seems that under some conditions, running make will determine that
automake need to be re-run. But you don't build-depend on automake,
causing the build failure.

So the fix is to add automake to your build-depends.

It might be caused by the lack of precision of ext3 vs tmpfs: I'm
building on tmpfs, which has sub-second precision. (ext4 has that too).

Lucas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to