On 24/12/09 at 12:04 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: > > I suggest there might be something wrong with the amd64 build box > you're using as the buildd report [1] shows that 0.9.5.dfsg-5 was built > successfully Dec 12th. I've also re-downloaded the 0.9.5.dfsg-5 version > from the mirrors and rebuilt under a pbuilder chroot and it built > successfully as well. The -4 version of the package had a problem in the > debian/rules that caused this behavior but it was fixed in the -5 release.
Could you please diff your log with mine, to see if the problem was possibly caused by different build-dep versions ? Thanks Lucas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
