On 24/12/09 at 13:02 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 24/12/09 at 12:04 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: > >> I suggest there might be something wrong with the amd64 build box > >> you're using as the buildd report [1] shows that 0.9.5.dfsg-5 was built > >> successfully Dec 12th. I've also re-downloaded the 0.9.5.dfsg-5 version > >> from the mirrors and rebuilt under a pbuilder chroot and it built > >> successfully as well. The -4 version of the package had a problem in the > >> debian/rules that caused this behavior but it was fixed in the -5 release. > > > > Could you please diff your log with mine, to see if the problem was > > possibly caused by different build-dep versions ? > > > I'm building on i386 as my amd64 boxes are currently still offline > along with my hppa and alpha machines. The official amd64 buildd I sent > the URL that was available for the log. When looking through it I didn't > see any failures. However that log format and your log format are > completely different and do not lend themselves to diff comparison.
I'm talking about a build in an up-to-date sid chroot, not something that happened 10 days ago. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
