Le mardi 03 janvier 2012 à 00:13 +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit : > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:19:57 +0200 Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote: > > [...] > > I am trying to see how much performance I may gain with ATLAS as a > > LAPACK replacement (I will also test the CPU-optimized > > libatlas-core2sse3-dev later on). > > > > I am trying to follow instructions included in > > http://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/sylvestre/2010/04/06/update_of_the_linear_algebra_libraries_i > > > > However, it seems that I am doing something wrong, since, after changing > > the alternatives, I am no longer able to compile (link, to be precise) > > my applications. > [...] > > Hello and happy new year! > > Any update on this bug? Unfortunately, I don't have any ETA on this.
> I took a look at the merged bug reports, but I cannot understand > how and/or when the bug will be fixed... See this bug on the actual solution: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=521813 > Is there a workaround? > I mean: is there something that I can do manually in order to make the > whole thing work correctly? Of course! When you run atlas, make sure that both blas and lapack ATLAS implementation are used in the configure (both runtime & -dev packages) S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
