On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:31:29 +0100 Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Le samedi 14 janvier 2012 à 19:16 +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit : [...] > > Could you please clarify what you suggest, and explicitly spell out the > > commands I should issue to switch to the reference implementations, and > > the commands to switch back to the ATLAS implementations? > > I would like to minimize the risk of breaking my production system! > Well, if you are looking for performance, continue to use your "pure atlas > configuration" (and you could even drop > blas from your system)
I am afraid that I won't be able to do otherwise, until this bug gets fixed... > > > > > > BTW, according to my original plan, I wanted to also test > > libatlas-core2sse3-dev, but the optimized packages have been dropped, > > as stated in the README.Debian file. [...] > > Could you please explain? > Sure. I am writing this email offline. I cannot point you to my original > email explaining this decision. However, here are some of the reasons: [...] > I hope you understand our choose. Yes, I now understand: as unfortunate as it can be, now I see why a really optimized ATLAS has to be built on the box where it will be used... Thanks a lot for clarifying. Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpQtTbOQsrwI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
