On 2012-01-13 13:59, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
| * jaalto <jari.aa...@cante.net> [2012-01-13 13:14:15 CET]:
| > On 2012-01-13 10:21, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
| > | Then please state it THERE, not HERE where the bugreport was about your
| > | confusion with not reading the documentation and wanting to have the
| > | intended way it works changed.
"intended way it works" is to die with an error on user input, Hm. Not
likely.
It's not my confusion as you tend to put it, it's the program's. The
root cause of the error has nothing to do with *.pub SSH files. It's
all explained in the patch rationale.
| > In 653993 the bug was closed with reasoning that with the suggested
| > change, by adding a check and warning, it would deny other uses of
| > program.
|
| That's right.
Not true. All uses would still be available.
| The error is the same, but the core of the bug (main body that
| triggered you to file it and the subject you chose for the bug) is not.
| Thus this one is closed while the other is open.
The error message looks the same in both cases. But the situations
where the two bugs were filed were different:
653993 Using standard SSH key file id_dsa.pub
653994 Using gitolite expected admin name
>From the log in 653994 you can see that the gitolite admin name was
set correctly with "-a". The bug is not correlated with the *.pub file
issue in 653993.
| > To clarify: the patch fixes the error exhibited in both 653993 (body,
| > the error message) and possibly 653994. The bug is not fixed by the
| > upstream change expressed in 653994 (see quote above).
CC'd 653994. That patch is in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653993#63
Please take the patch and analyze the cause of error with the Upstream.
Jari
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
