On 08/29/2011 11:01 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Thomas Schmitt, le Sat 27 Aug 2011 21:54:31 +0200, a écrit : >> This idea must come from libacl-dev. >> And really in >> /lib/libacl.la >> i read >> dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libattr.la' > > Yes, that's the problem: it should rather be a -lattr, because > libattr.la is not shipped any more. That would be fixed by a newer build > of the acl package, but unfortunately it FTBFS ATM (PATH_MAX, #636512). > > libisofs not building was becoming more and more a problem, so I patched > the libacl.la file by hand (yes, a bad thing).
A porter binNMU of the old days ;-) Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
