Sorry thanks for your patch... as the release goal says if you can make a case for using it then we should ship (and use your pat h, thanks a lot for taking the effort).
I'll let nathans comment what he thinks, Cheers On Aug 27, 2011 4:00 PM, "harish badrinath" <harishbadrin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Niv Sardi <xa...@debian.org> wrote: >> http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval >> >> IIRC, It's a release goal. > > Well that was embarrassing :). I will close the bug. > > > Sorry, > Harish > > >> On Aug 27, 2011 3:42 PM, "Harish Badrinath" <harishbadrin...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Package: libattr1-dev >>> Version: 1:2.4.46-3 >>> Severity: important >>> Tags: experimental sid >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> It seems that libattr.la is not being included in the binary deb packages. >>> It was observed under hurd-i386, sid. But on linux-i386 the problem was >>> not existant. >>> >>> I have attached a simple patch, that fixed the issue. Dont know if its the >>> "right way to do it", >>> but dpkg -S started to show libattr.la files after the changes were done. >>> >>> >>> Have a nice day, >>> Harish >>> >>> -- System Information: >>> Debian Release: wheezy/sid >>> Architecture: hurd-i386 (i686-AT386) >>> >>> Kernel: GNU-Mach 1.3.99/Hurd-0.3 >>> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) >>> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash >>> >>> Versions of packages libattr1-dev depends on: >>> ii libattr1 1:2.4.46-3 Extended attribute shared library >>> ii libc0.3-dev [libc6-dev] 2.13-16 Embedded GNU C Library: Developmen >>> >>> libattr1-dev recommends no packages. >>> >>> libattr1-dev suggests no packages. >>> >>> -- no debconf information >> > > >
