Thomas Schmitt, le Sat 27 Aug 2011 21:54:31 +0200, a écrit : > This idea must come from libacl-dev. > And really in > /lib/libacl.la > i read > dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libattr.la'
Yes, that's the problem: it should rather be a -lattr, because libattr.la is not shipped any more. That would be fixed by a newer build of the acl package, but unfortunately it FTBFS ATM (PATH_MAX, #636512). libisofs not building was becoming more and more a problem, so I patched the libacl.la file by hand (yes, a bad thing). > So probably one should re-name the bug to > "libacl-dev on hurd-i386 depends on LAFileRemoval victim libattr.la" Well, for the hurd-i386 case, just a rebuild should work, it just doesn't build any more. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
