Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 12.05.2011, 11:40 +0530 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > Am Donnerstag, den 12.05.2011, 14:04 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise: > > On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 11:23 +0530, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > I’m happy to take suggestions. > > > > Personally I would go for the mirror option, seems to be in keeping with > > the minimalism that the program is designed for. > > > > That said, I run bog-standard GNOME 2 for now and mirroring might not > > work well for other more advanced/customisable window managers. > > brr, so much complexity, and then the code also has to work on Windows > (or at least compile by excluding it with macros). Maybe the old > behaviour as default (arbitrary monitor, e.g. leave it to gtk’s > fullscreening code) and an option to specify other monitors using RandR > names is a sane compromise.
I should add that I have only occasional access to an external montior, so for me to work on that I have to have both the monitor and time at the same time... so don’t hold your breath. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
