Hi,

Am Donnerstag, den 12.05.2011, 12:27 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
> > The latter behaviour seems to be the most intuitive and logical to me,
> > and also the most flexible – not unlikely that someone wants to put
> > „Intermission“ on the projector while preparing something on the laptop
> > monitor. Guess I will have to re-work the patch.
> 
> Well, with sm there is no non-full-screen window to begin with like
> there is with geeqie so in sm there no way to determine which screen to
> put the message onto. Therefore you can do one of these:
> 
>       * choose one screen at random
>       * mirror onto all screens
>       * fail when there is more than one screen
>       * offer a command-line option
> 
> I don't think random screens or failing are good ideas.
> 
> > Not sure if I like mirroring on several displays though, and as stated
> > before, I’m trying hard to avoid configuration :-)
> 
> I don't think the alternatives work.

the is the option of leaving it to the window manager to offer the user
to move the window. But I guess that works only for advanced WM users
that know the shortcuts.

Command-line option is of course nice for users who know man pages, but
I really would like the program to be useful out of the box even for
those who click icons. What is the best default behavior then? Mirror on
all or random (i.e. primary) screen? Or even add buttons to shift it to
other screens (but that again kind of compromises the minimalistic idea
of the program. I don’t even like the Quit button :-)). I’m happy to
take suggestions.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to