On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:39 PM, folkert <folk...@vanheusden.com> wrote: >> >> > Reading one byte at a time doesn't seem like the best way. Could you >> >> > use a buffer of 16 k? >> >> >> >> I agree this is not optimal (even though works and is no bug), looking at >> >> the >> >> use of the myread function in the source code its unclear to me why it is >> >> implemented like that. Folkert, is there any reason it should be like >> >> that? >> > >> > At that time it was the easiest way to implement it. >> > Haven't looked at the code but from the top of my head it'll be kludgy >> > to implement now due to the openssl code. >> >> Why? Shouldn't be hard to pass a buffer to SSL. > > So when can I expect your patch? :-)
That's what you said last time. :p -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
