On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 6:04 PM, folkert <folk...@vanheusden.com> wrote: >> > Reading one byte at a time doesn't seem like the best way. Could you use a >> > buffer of 16 k? >> >> I agree this is not optimal (even though works and is no bug), looking at the >> use of the myread function in the source code its unclear to me why it is >> implemented like that. Folkert, is there any reason it should be like that? > > At that time it was the easiest way to implement it. > Haven't looked at the code but from the top of my head it'll be kludgy > to implement now due to the openssl code.
Why? Shouldn't be hard to pass a buffer to SSL. Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
