> >> > Reading one byte at a time doesn't seem like the best way. Could you use > >> > a buffer of 16 k? > >> > >> I agree this is not optimal (even though works and is no bug), looking at > >> the > >> use of the myread function in the source code its unclear to me why it is > >> implemented like that. Folkert, is there any reason it should be like that? > > > > At that time it was the easiest way to implement it. > > Haven't looked at the code but from the top of my head it'll be kludgy > > to implement now due to the openssl code. > > Why? Shouldn't be hard to pass a buffer to SSL.
So when can I expect your patch? :-) Folkert van Heusden -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
